My frustration leads me to think that I ought to take this opportunity
to remind readers – without meaning to be spammy – that I’m available as an
expert witness to anyone who may be thinking of bringing a case against the
government based on NHPA Section 106 and impacts on traditional cultural places. I’ve performed such services off and on over
the last four decades or so, generally to good effect. I think I can be helpful in critiquing agency
compliance with Section 106 and other laws (e.g. the National Environmental Policy Act), particularly where traditional cultural properties,
tribal interests, historic property identification standards, and consultation
practices are involved.
Naturally I do like to get paid for expert witness work, but
I’ve done a lot of it for free and am willing to do more; a client just gets my
more undivided attention if they pay for it. When I am engaged for pay, I try to keep my
rates low, especially for indigenous groups, local communities and
organizations, environmental groups, and private citizens.
Having spent most of my professional life trying to make
sure that tribal and community cultural concerns are effectively addressed
under the environmental and historic preservation laws, I’m appalled at what’s
happened to practice under those laws in the last decade or so. If I can be of any help to plaintiffs trying
to promote more responsibility and responsiveness on the part of the federal
government, I’d be happy to try. Contact
me at tfking106@aol.com.
No comments:
Post a Comment