Since it was my competition, my prize, and this is my blog, I’m
going to give myself the luxury of commenting here on all the entries we received. Other judges -- and readers so inclined -- are welcome to do the same.
I actually was rather disappointed with all the entries, though
I agreed with the other judges that all (well, at least most) had strengths,
and that the winner provided the best basis for further discussion. Most seemed
to me to be too narrowly focused on what professionals in the field think of as
cultural heritage (old buildings, archaeological sites, and the like), and
sadly, none seemed to find an alternative to some kind of government
regulation. I hasten to say that I can’t think of an alternative to government
regulation either, but I was hoping that some sharp, open-minded Millennial
would come up with something totally different.
My summary comments on the six runners-up went like this:
·
“Doesn’t propose anything but hunker down and
pontificate.”
·
“Good try, but underestimates the complexity of
what’s in play. Implicitly oriented toward regulation of large, heavily funded
projects.”
·
“Well meaning, but restricted to historic
preservation/archaeology, and doomed by reliance on a statewide survey of
interests; if you don’t lay bare your interests in advance during the survey,
you’re screwed.”
·
“Well meaning, but doesn’t really outline a
program, and narrowly focused on traditional historic preservation.”
·
“Interesting elements (e.g. Cultural Resource Bill
of Rights) but ultimately too much an historic preservation-archaeology dictatorship.”
·
“Semi-coherent proposal for mob rule.”
Of the winner, I wrote: “Good try, and Community Heritage
Boards would (maybe) be an improvement on SHPOs, etc., but they’re also likely
to become petty local despots. Very east-coast perspective. Reminiscent of
Randolph Hester, perhaps not surprisingly (and that’s a good thing). No
comprehension of western, tribal, etc. realities, and no real federal government
role.
This is not meant as a slam on anyone or everyone, and I’m
grateful to all the contestants for giving us things to think about besides
what I’m ignoring on Washington DC’s streets today. We’ll soon (I hope) have a dedicated
website on which to discuss these matters further.
5 comments:
How does historic preservation rank on a list of issues we ought to be concerned about? I think we've stepped over the investigative priorities threshold between cultural history and species survival.
If we want people, generally, to care about historic preservation,much less do anything supportive, then feed them, keep them healthy, educate them. Hungry, sick, and ignorant people couldn't care less about their or anybody else's heritage.
How does historic preservation rank on a list of issues we ought to be concerned about? I think we've stepped over the investigative priorities threshold between cultural history and species survival.
If we want people, generally, to care about historic preservation,much less do anything supportive, then feed them, keep them healthy, educate them. Hungry, sick, and ignorant people couldn't care less about their or anybody else's heritage.
How does historic preservation rank on a list of issues we ought to be concerned about? I think we've stepped over the investigative priorities threshold between cultural history and species survival.
If we want people, generally, to care about historic preservation,much less do anything supportive, then feed them, keep them healthy, educate them. Hungry, sick, and ignorant people couldn't care less about their or anybody else's heritage.
Hello Dr. King,
Did you ever create that dedicated website for discussing the future of CRM practice and policy? I think it's becoming more and more apparent that we really will need a plan to rebuild after this administration is through with the NHPA.
Thanks for your blog!
Jeremy Wells set up the website, but then he moved, I went off to chase Amelia Earhart, and I've lost track of what happened with it. Thanks for the query; I'll ask.
Post a Comment